Author
|
Topic: mehwidge
|
Mr. K
Racist
Member # 2
Member Rated:
|
posted 03-05-2004 08:32 AM
Someone smarter than me came up with a decent solution for this gay marriage thing...
...if religious people want to claim marriage for themselves, then they can have it. The word "marriage" will cease to have any legal meaning.
It will be entirely replaced by the concept of "civil unions", or hopefully something a little snappier.
If, as a religious zealot, you choose not to accept that civilly unioned Bob and Frank are "married", then fine. Take your word and cram it up your tight ass.
The rest of the civilized world will simply accept that Bob and Frank have now gained certain legal rights and responsibilites, and the religious freaks can go back to calling a penis a "peepee" or whatever gets them thru the day.
OK, that's solved. What's next?
From: Cinnabar Island | Registered: Feb 2000
| IP: Logged
|
|
Donald
Bob the Builder
Member # 1551
Member Rated:
|
posted 03-05-2004 09:34 AM
Sounds logical, which means it'll never happen.
From: In your girl's panties | Registered: Feb 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
PowerAngelic
I wanna be the very best, like no one ever was...
Member # 693
Member Rated:
|
posted 03-05-2004 11:30 AM
But then the gays are like "WTF we want marriage, too."
The smart people will be like "You're getting marriage, it's just not called marriage."
And then the gays are like "WTF we want marriage, too."
The stupidity works both ways, unfortunately.
- - - - - It's about Power.
From: Canada. Stop Laughing. ;_; | Registered: Jul 2000
| IP: Logged
|
|
Rolken
Vulcan
Member # 7
Member Rated:
|
posted 03-05-2004 12:04 PM
Mehwidge. Mehwidge... ith what breength uth together... today.
From: Provo, UT | Registered: Feb 2000
| IP: Logged
|
|
Mr. K
Racist
Member # 2
Member Rated:
|
posted 03-05-2004 01:22 PM
PowerAngelic: But then the gays are like "WTF we want marriage, too."
Then they can take that up with their church, but it's no longer a government issue. The government wouldn't be able to say who is married any more than I could successfully petition my Congressman for a bar mitzvah. It's out of his hands.
From: Cinnabar Island | Registered: Feb 2000
| IP: Logged
|
|
Slade_64
chipmunk pr0n author
Member # 804
Member Rated:
|
posted 03-05-2004 01:48 PM
quote: Originally posted by Mr. K: OK, that's solved. What's next?
Same relative civil unions.
- - - - - Bucket.
From: Funky Town Texas | Registered: Aug 2000
| IP: Logged
|
|
Jman
Farting Nudist
Member # 618
Member Rated:
|
posted 03-05-2004 02:51 PM
Hem Hem
From: da burgh | Registered: Jul 2000
| IP: Logged
|
|
starCaliber
is evil and also MewtwoSama
Member # 268
Member Rated:
|
posted 03-05-2004 04:56 PM
Mr. K: [solution]
OK, I'm not going to make a habit of posting about stupid political bullshit, but this is exactly the solution I've been proposing to people (and with relative success).
At first I was like "What? People are actually fucking fighting to keep this illegal?" But after casually talking to a few folks around my building, I was reminded that the vast majority of people are less logical than me. A friend of mine was like "Gay marriage man, that's just...man that's FUCKED up! That's so wrong man, it totally messes with the meaning of marriage."
"So, uh. What if gay people could still be legally bound together, but it wasn't called marriage?"
"Oh yeah, that's fine. But marriage is a man and a woman, dude. One penis, one vagina. It's sacred, furreals."
"Uh, yeah."
I think legislators will eventually figure out the civil union thing and all will be well.
From: San Francisco, CA | Registered: Apr 2000
| IP: Logged
|
|
JohtoMaster
Farting Nudist
Member # 1023
Member Rated:
|
posted 03-05-2004 05:03 PM
quote: Originally posted by Rolken: Mehwidge. Mehwidge... ith what breength uth together... today.
Man and WIFE! Say Man and WIFE!
...or, in light of this topic...
Man and HUSBAND! Say Man and HUSBAND!
From: Valparaiso, IN, USA | Registered: Oct 2000
| IP: Logged
|
|
BigCheese
Farting Nudist
Member # 1479
Member Rated:
|
posted 03-05-2004 05:27 PM
Not necessarily all religious people are really fighting to keep it from happening. Even if they disagree, some (such as myself) won't stop someone else from getting married just because it contradicts my personal beliefs. It's not for me to say.
- - - - - I have a nice butt!
From: The land of milk and honey...and cheese | Registered: Jan 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
Wintermute
My custom title sucks.
Member # 5
Member Rated:
|
posted 03-05-2004 05:37 PM
"civil unions", or hopefully something a little snappier.
I think a lot hinges on this.
A problem with your, "then they can take it up with their church" reply to PA is that not all gays (and for that matter, non-gays) who still want the word "marriage" want it because of their religion. It's just part of the language and culture.
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba | Registered: Feb 2000
| IP: Logged
|
|
10,000Lb.Snorlax
loves long time.
Member # 13
Member Rated:
|
posted 03-05-2004 06:52 PM
why are you guys talking about gay marriage? do you want to be gay and get married?
From: Denver | Registered: Feb 2000
| IP: Logged
|
|
Charmeleon42
Date Rapist
Member # 1066
Member Rated:
|
posted 03-05-2004 07:02 PM
What Toby said - it's a cultural thing. They want to get married because that's what you do with people. Getting a civil union doesn't have the same meaning, so that's not their goal...
(Trying to keep it short, you guys.)
From: Mountain Dew Land | Registered: Oct 2000
| IP: Logged
|
|
Mr. K
Racist
Member # 2
Member Rated:
|
posted 03-05-2004 10:43 PM
'mute: A problem with your, "then they can take it up with their church" reply to PA is that not all gays (and for that matter, non-gays) who still want the word "marriage" want it because of their religion. It's just part of the language and culture.
Well, that's about to change.
We'll run several high-profile 15-minute long ads featuring lovable celebrity person Tom Hanks and he will explain the new rules to everyone and they will just have to accept it or he will go Normandy on their asses.
Also Oprah will hug everyone and pat them on the back and tell them it's OK.
Also I propose replacing the term "marriage" with "fuckbind". [ 03-05-2004, 10:51 PM: Message edited by: Mr. K ]
From: Cinnabar Island | Registered: Feb 2000
| IP: Logged
|
|
Donald
Bob the Builder
Member # 1551
Member Rated:
|
posted 03-05-2004 11:05 PM
quote: Originally posted by 10,000Lb.Snorlax: why are you guys talking about gay marriage? do you want to be gay and get married?
Because we have to keep the really pointless issue smokescreen up until cfalcon learns how to make a point in less than 1000 words.
Speaking of issues, how 'bout that defecit? 7 trillion dollars... whew.
From: In your girl's panties | Registered: Feb 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
ceoalex316
Time for the flaming leprosy party
Member # 338
|
posted 03-06-2004 01:33 AM
Marriage under the church can not give them the same legal rights that marriage under the government can.
It is not only about the fucking word. And you can still have a really big cultural ceremony and form a civil union. So it is not about the ceremony.
Maybe Bush can just stick to his administration policy and just change the word civil union to marriage and marriage into civil union. But now you get benefits under a civil union.
- - - - - Maximum Penetration Industries.
From: NYC | Registered: Apr 2000
| IP: Logged
|
|
Mentar the Malady Monkey
worst username ever
Member # 1182
Member Rated:
|
posted 03-06-2004 02:07 AM
Err, a church wouldn't necessarily have to sanction marriage. You could have a hippie do it, or a priest of the Church of Darwin.
From: Pandemonium, HL, Hades | Registered: Nov 2000
| IP: Logged
|
|
Jman
Farting Nudist
Member # 618
Member Rated:
|
posted 03-06-2004 04:21 PM
see we need cfalcon here to keep this arguement going
From: da burgh | Registered: Jul 2000
| IP: Logged
|
|
Thomas
Farting Nudist
Member # 3371
Member Rated:
|
posted 03-06-2004 06:48 PM
I am posting in this thread to give eProps for The Princess Bride reference.
Registered: May 2003
| IP: Logged
|
|
Psybro
Half Psyduck. Half Slowbro. All cop.
Member # 290
Member Rated:
|
posted 03-06-2004 09:13 PM
Or you could just let the faggots shack up and fuck what the churches think. Who gives a shit what the majority thinks anyway? About a third of them think we found WMD in Iraq for Christ's sake.
This whole thing is like interracial marriage; the judiciary is going to slap some sense into everyone and twenty years down the line people are going to look back and think 'What the fuck was up with that'. [ 03-06-2004, 09:50 PM: Message edited by: Psybro ]
From: Sheffield, South Yorkshire, UK | Registered: Apr 2000
| IP: Logged
|
|
Mr. K
Racist
Member # 2
Member Rated:
|
posted 03-25-2004 06:49 AM
I actually saw some Republican idiot the other day, right there on the teevee, say that the judicial branch of the government had no right to interpret the Constitution...
From: Cinnabar Island | Registered: Feb 2000
| IP: Logged
|
|
Dweedle
My hands and feet are mangos
Member # 1209
Member Rated:
|
posted 03-25-2004 09:42 AM
ahahahahahahahahahahaahahah
- - - - - the only way to get pass this will be to commit suicune
From: second of all, Quagmire's not really a bad guy! | Registered: Nov 2000
| IP: Logged
|
|
Mewtwo Master
Farting Nudist
Member # 2257
Member Rated:
|
posted 03-28-2004 10:51 PM
quote: Originally posted by Donald: Sounds logical, which means it'll never happen.
It's sad, but you're probably right.
quote: Originally posted by Mr. K: Also I propose replacing the term "marriage" with "fuckbind".
I think that would be really hilarious, but I also think that it won't happen. I mean, "Fuckbinding. Fuckbinding ith what breength uth together... today." Just doesn't sound right. Ya know?
- - - - - Guys in the army should wear a helmets and codpieces, to protect both heads.
From: USA | Registered: Oct 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|