The Azure Heights Forum


Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply
my profile | search | faq | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» The Azure Heights Forum   » Main Campus   » Kabuto Archaeological Society   » RBY Accuracy

UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!    
Author Topic: RBY Accuracy
MasamuneXGP
Farting Nudist
Member # 3412

Member Rated:
posted 07-09-2003 05:01 AM      Profile for MasamuneXGP   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Hurray! My account finally got activated! I'm an Azurian!! XD

lol anyway, you guys might recognize me from NetBattle. I'm working on spiffing up our RBY mode a bit, and would like to varify that I've got the right formulas for RBY accuracy vs. GSC accuracy. Here's what I've got:

AN = Accuracy Number (0 - 255)
RN = Random Number (0 - 255)
"<=" = Greater than or equal to

In GSC: If RN <= AN Then Hit = True

In RBY: If RN + 1 <= AN Then Hit = True

Would that be right? Thx in advance for the help guys.

From: New Jersey | Registered: Jun 2003  |  IP: Logged
Dark_Herakurosu
Farting Nudist
Member # 1677

Member Rated:
posted 07-10-2003 01:16 AM      Profile for Dark_Herakurosu   Author's Homepage   Email Dark_Herakurosu   Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I believe that when comparing GSC accuracy to RBY accuracy, the AN changes from 256 to 255, respectively. Formulas look solid though, and simple enough.

Also: Dear lord jesus mary jane great scott etc, Masa has invaded this hole too. [PBJ Time!]

- - - - -
There is more money being spent on breast implants and Viagra today than on Alzheimer's research. This means that by 2040, there should be a large elderly population with perky boobs, huge erections, and absolutely no recollection of what to do with them.

From: the wreckage of Indianapolis | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
Jolt135
Farting Nudist
Member # 1974

Member Rated:
posted 07-10-2003 12:39 PM      Profile for Jolt135   Author's Homepage   Email Jolt135   Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Change the "+ 1 <=" in the second formula to a simple "<", and you have a formula that remains accurate, AND helps show why the error exists.
From: Woodbridge, VA, USA | Registered: Jul 2001  |  IP: Logged


All times are ET (US)  
Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | Azure Heights Pokémon Laboratory

© 2000-2016, Maximum Penetration Industries.

Karpe Diem


The views and opinions expressed on this page are strictly those of the author(s). The contents and links have not been reviewed or approved by the University of Miami.