This is topic Sp. Attacking Wigglytuff in forum Oddish Memorial Lecture Hall at The Azure Heights Forum.
To visit this topic, use this URL:
Posted by Dark_Togetic (Member # 3418) on 10-26-2003, 04:25 PM:
Trying to make a non-standard Wigglytuff moveset, I came up with this...
@ Chesto Berry
... Which makes quite a weird Wiggly, with no STABed moves and a Modest nature. Definitely not something one would expect in a battle, so it's possible the idea might work. On the other side, Wiggly's defensive stats are low, and I don't know if it could stay alive long enough to pull off this moveset. And that's why I'm posting it here, to know what you think of it.
Comments, suggestions, etc. are welcome. Oh and, this is intended for single battling.
~ Dark Togetic ~
(Mom! Mom! The bear ate Koffing!)
Posted by Uiru (Member # 437) on 10-26-2003, 08:19 PM:
Wiggly's defencive stats are better than you think, as long as you pump them with EV's. HP doesn't need any; filling both DF and SD results in a 66% overall defence increase. Unless you want a kamikaze Wigglytuff.
I still like the Counter version better. Oh God, if Counter is on FRLG's TM list... *drool*
Posted by IDLon2000 (Member # 3556) on 11-20-2003, 01:51 AM:
I really have to agree with you on Counter. Its fun to go on NetBattle and KO something with wiggly, then rest. Im not sure how well Wiggly will do as a special attacker though. However, Fake Tears may do well to ruin Baton Passers and to aid in 2 on 2s. I suspect Wigglytuff could play a nice role sitting in a two on two as a supporter of some kind. When i find my guide i will try to elaborate.
Posted by Dark_Togetic (Member # 3418) on 11-29-2003, 12:01 AM:
Hm? Does Fake Tears affect both opponents on 2v2? Sorry if this has been answered before, but I don't have much experience with Double/Multi Battles...
Of course I agree Counter would be a better choice for Wigglytuff. But it seems the TMs for FRLG will be the same, according to Meowth346... And that makes me wonder if Blissey's popularity on battles will decrease because of this.
[ 11-29-2003, 12:05 AM: Message edited by: Dark_Togetic ]