Now in Phaser, compute this number using steps h = 0.01 and h = 0.005 and algorithms Euler, Improved Euler, Runge-Kutta4, Dormand-Prince5(4), and Dormand-Prince8(5,3). Following the golden rule
What to do in practice: In real life applications, it is impossible to be certain if numerically generated solutions of differential equations are reliable, or how large the errors might be. The golden rule of practice is to compute the same solution using several algorithms with various step sizes. If the variations in these computations are large (more than you can accept for a particular application) your problem is most likely a dangerous one. If the variations in these computations are small enough, most likely you get a reliable answer out of the machine.
conclude that this problem is indeed dangerous to compute.
Next, In the Dormand-Prince 5(4), set the step h = 0.01 and decrease the Absolute error and Relative error from 1.0E-7 until Phaser refuses to compute the value x(1). What is the smallest error tolerance for which PHASER refuses to compute infinity? Monitoring the Console in the Numericas Editor, report at which t value PHASER stops computations for your set tolerances.